Authorised Representatives for Distance Sellers: Appointing the EPR Mandate
The representative who holds your registration in a state where you have no establishment: what the mandate covers, how to choose and contract one, and the failure modes when the paperwork and the register disagree.
The short answer
Where a distance seller has no establishment in the state of sale, the framework's registration runs through an authorised representative established there: a mandated party who registers the seller, files its declarations, pays or arranges its fees, and answers the register's questions in the seller's name. The mandate is the EPR representative of the roles station - not the conformity representative, not a fiscal representative, not a returns address - and its appointment is a written, state-specific act whose details land in the register itself.
This guide covers choosing, contracting and living with the mandate.
Choosing: the representative market and its differences
The market offers three species: specialist compliance firms (registers are their trade; multi-state desks exist), producer responsibility organisations offering foreign-seller services in their state, and professional firms (law and accountancy) holding mandates as an ancillary service. The evaluation criteria are operational: the states actually covered with live register experience; the data interface (how your placed quantities reach their filings, and how their filings' evidence reaches you); liability and continuity terms (what happens to your registration if the firm is acquired or exits); and price structure against your volumes, since per-state fixed fees across twenty-seven states are the tail's whole economics. References from sellers in your category outweigh brochures - the register's questions are category-specific in practice.
The contract's load-bearing clauses
Four clauses carry the mandate's weight. Scope per state and category, exhaustively listed - an unlisted category is an unregistered one. Data duties in both directions with deadlines (your quantities to them in filing format by a date; their filing confirmations and register extracts to you within days, because the marketplace's verification will ask you, not them). Change notification both ways (your range, volumes or entities; their status, staff or register position). And exit mechanics: the register's record must be transferable, with the outgoing representative's cooperation contracted in advance, because a registration stranded with an uncooperative former mandate is the tail's ugliest incident. Read the clauses against the suspension ladder of the marketplace guide - the contract is the appeal's evidence supply line.
Living with twenty-seven mandates
The operating rhythm: one internal owner for the mandate portfolio; a calendar joining every state's filing dates to the data pipeline's delivery dates; an annual reconciliation per state (register position versus filings versus fees paid versus marketplace records - four numbers that must agree); and a change protocol that runs every range extension, entity change or new state through the mandate list before it runs through the shop's settings. The portfolio is small enough to govern and large enough to drift; the annual reconciliation is the anti-drift instrument, and its findings are invariably clerical, cheap and - left another year - expensive.
The representative is a relationship, not a receipt
Across a decade of filings, the representative will field questions the seller never hears about - register queries, category determinations, a marketplace's discrepancy notice - and the quality of those unobserved answers is the mandate's real product. Choose for judgement, contract for evidence, reconcile annually. The cheapest mandate in a state is occasionally the right one; the mandate whose filings you cannot produce in an hour is never right at any price.
The mandate count is a strategy metric
Count the mandates and you have the map's fixed-cost skeleton in one number; divide the contribution of the states they cover and you have the strategy's health. Boards reviewing European expansion should ask for both numbers together - mandates held, and margin per mandated state - because the pair exposes the tail's truth faster than any channel report. The representative portfolio is not administration. It is the shape of the European business, drawn in appointments.
A note on bundled mandates
Bundled multi-state mandates (one contract, one data feed, twenty-seven desks behind a single interface) are the market's answer to the tail, and their convenience carries a concentration question the annual reconciliation should ask aloud: if the bundle's operator failed, how many of your states go dark on the same morning, and how fast could the registrations be re-homed? Hold the register extracts independently, keep the underlying data portable, and the bundle remains what it should be - an efficiency, not a single point of failure wearing one.
Primary sources on the record
- Regulation (EU) 2025/40 of 19 December 2024 on packaging and packaging waste, Official Journal text on EUR-Lex.
- European Commission, packaging waste topic page - guidance and act progress.
- Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 of 20 June 2019 on market surveillance and compliance of products, text on EUR-Lex - the surveillance framework, including fulfilment service providers.
- Regulation (EU) 2023/988 of 10 May 2023 on general product safety, text on EUR-Lex - the online marketplace duties that sit beside the PPWR.
Legal status: Article 45 of Regulation (EU) 2025/40; mandate mechanics per member state. Application position for this topic: Appointments ahead of selling into each state.